???????????? ?????????? ?????"????"???--????????? ????????????? ??????????;???????????????????????????????? ??????????? ????????????????--"????-????"???? ?????????????????????????????? ?????1990???????2020????????????"????"???? ???"????"???;?????????????????? ?????"??????"??????--????? ?????????????--????????? ?????????????????????????????????????--????????????????? ??????????????????????? content summary Looking at Hitler, he only had colonial ideas, but obviously lacked a strategy for conquering the world-he just followed the trend of the times, and he could become a waver who contributed to the flames, and he did not hesitate to form an alliance with Stalin for this; this is because Hitler always lacked a clear plan of action. He just imitated the American colonists and colonized Eastern Europe as North America, but he didn't know that the world had entered the era of globalization-"one prosperity, one loss, all loss" means that no conquest can only win a local area. If a country or a place is forcibly plundered, its mistake is like Iraq in the 1990s and Russia in the 2020s. Hitler only had the dream of a "Great Germany", but no strategy of "conquering the world"; the collusion and war between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia was nothing more than a bloody plot between two "socialist gangs"-all these things, Many verifications can be obtained from this book "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich-A History of Nazi Germany". So I use it as a draft to illustrate my point of view. But the author of "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich-A History of Nazi Germany", like Hitler, did not realize this. This may be a common problem of that era.